OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE OF FAMILY BUSINESS GROUPS
ESTRUTURA DE PROPRIEDADE DE FAMILY BUSINESS GROUPS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33362/visao.v9i2.2470Palavras-chave:
Ownership Structure, Family Business Groups. Ownership Structure. Market reformsResumo
This study seeks to analyze the relationship between the ownership structure of Family Business Groups and the institutional environment. Family Business Groups prevail in emerging countries as diverse organizational structures that aggregate various companies under the control of a family or a reduced number of people. This economically relevant structure is responsible for a significant share of countries' Gross Domestic Product and frequently congregates the largest private companies in their respective countries. Institutional reforms have been implemented in emerging economies in order to support the integration of other nations from a trade perspective. This paper contributes to the literature by developing propositions on the effect of institutional reforms on the ownership structure of Family Business Groups.
Keywords: Family Business Groups. Ownership Structure. Market reforms.
Resumo: Este estudo busca analisar a relação entre a estrutura de propriedade de Family Business Groups e o ambiente institucional. Family Business Groups predominam em países emergentes como estruturas organizacionais variadas que agregam várias empresas sob o controle de uma família ou um número reduzido de pessoas. Essa estrutura economicamente relevante é responsável for uma parcela significativa do Produto Interno Bruto dos países e frequentemente congrega as maiores empresas privadas em seus respectivos países. Reformas institucionais foram implementadas em economias emergentes a fim de apoiar a integração de outras nações sob uma perspectiva comercial. Este artigo contribui com a literatura ao desenvolver proposições sobre o efeito de reformas institucionais na estrutura de propriedade de Family Business Groups.
Palavras-chave: Family Business Groups. Estrutura de propriedade. Reformas de mercado.
Referências
AGUILERA, R. V.; JACKSON, G. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, v. 28, n. 3, p. 447-465, 2003.
ALMEIDA, H.; WOLFENZON, D. Should business groups be dismantled? The equilibrium costs of efficient internal capital markets. Journal of Financial Economics, v. 79, n. 1, p. 99-144, 2006.
ANDREWS, W. A; DOWLING, M. J. Explaining performance changes in newly privatized firms. Journal of Management Studies, v. 35, n. 5, p. 601-617, 1998.
AOKI, M. Toward an economic model of the Japanese firm. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 28, p.1-27, 1990.
BANDEIRA-DE-MELLO, R.; MARCON, R. The contingent value of business group affiliation: the case of debt financing in Brazil. Encontro Anual da ANPAD 32. Anais. Rio de Janeiro: ANPAD, 2008.
BANDEIRA-DE-MELLO, R.; MARCON, R.; ALBERTON, A. Drivers of discretionary firm donations in Brazil. Brazilian Administration Review, v. 4, n. 5, p. 275-288, 2008.
Bertrand, M.; Mehta, P.; Mullainathan, S. Ferreting out tunneling: an application to Indian business groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 117, n. 1, p. 121-148, 2002.
CARNEY, M.; GEDAJLOVIC, E.; HUEGENS, P.; VAN ESSEN, M.; VAN OOSTERHOUT, J. Business group affiliation, performance, context, and strategy: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, v. 54, n. 3, p. 437-460, 2011.
CASANOVA, L. Global Latinas: Latin America's emerging multinationals. Nova York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
CHANG, S. J.; HONG, J. Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. The Academy of Management Journal, v. 43, n. 3, p. 429-448, 2000.
CHANG, S. J.; HONG, J. How much does the business group matter in Korea? Strategic Management Journal, v. 23, n. 3, p. 265-274, 2002.
CLAESSENS, S.; DJANKOV, S.; LANG, L. H. P. The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, v. 58, n. 1, p. 81-112, 2000.
CLAESSENS, S.; FEIJEN, E.; LAEVEN, L. Political Connections and preferential access to finance: the role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics, v. 88, n. 3, p. 554-580, 2008.
CLAESSENS, S.; FAN, J. P. H.; LANG, L. H. P. The Benefits and Costs of Group Affiliation: Evidence from East Asia. Emerging Markets Review, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-26, 2006.
COLLIN, S. O. Why are these islands of power found in the consciousness of oceans of ownership: institutional and governance hypotheses explaining the existence of business groups in Sweden. Journal of Management Studies, v. 35, p. 719-746, 1998.
COLPAN, A. M. Dynamic effects of product diversity, international scope, and keiretsu membership on the performance of Japan's textile firms in the 1990s. Asian Business & Management, v. 5, n. 3, p. 419-445, 2006.
DAVIS, G. F.; DIEKMAN, K.; TINSLEY, C. H. The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. American Sociological Review, v. 59, p. 547-570, 1994.
DELLA PIANA, B.; VECCHI, A.; CACIA, C. Towards a better understanding of Family Business Groups and their key dimensions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, v. 3, n. 3, p. 174-192, 2012.
DEMSETZ, H. The structure of ownership and the theory of firm. Journal of Law and Economics, v. 26, p. 375-390, 1983.
DEMSETZ, H.; LEHN, K. The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences. Journal of Political Economy, v. 93, n. 6, p. 1155-1177, 1985.
FAMA, E. F.; JENSEN, M. C. Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, v. 26, n. 2, p. 327-349, 1983.
FISMAN, R.; KHANNA, T. Facilitating development: the role of business groups. World Development, v. 32, p. 609-628, 2004.
GHEMAWAT, P.; KHANNA, T. The nature of diversified business groups: A research design and two case studies. Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 46, p. 35-61, 1998.
GHOSH, S. Affiliation and firm performance: Evidence from Indian business groups. The Manchester School, v. 78, n. 3, p. 183–200, 2010.
GRANOVETTER, M. Business groups. In: N. J. SMELSER; R. SWEDBERG (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology. p. 453-475. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.
GRANOVETTER, M. Business Groups and Social Organization. In: SMELSER, N. J.; SWEDBERG, R. (Eds.). Handbook of Economic Sociology. 2. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation, 2005.
GREENWOOD, R.; HININGS, C. R. Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, v. 21, n. 4, p. 1022-1054, 1996.
GUILLÉN, M. F. Business groups in emerging economies: a resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, v. 43, p. 362-380, 2000.
HENISZ, W. J. The Institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1-31, 2000.
HOFFMAN, A. J. Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, v. 42, n. 4, p. 351-371, 1999.
HOSKISSON, R. E.; JOHNSON, R. A.; WHITE, R. E. Diversified Business Groups and Corporate Refocusing in Emerging Economies. Journal of Management, v. 31, n. 6, p. 941-965, 2005.
HOSKISSON, R. E.; JOHNSON, R. A.; YIU, D.; WAN, W. P. Restructuring strategies of diversified business groups: differences associated with country institutional environments. In: HITT, M. A.; FREEMAN, E.; HARRISON, J. S. (Eds.). The Blackwell handbook of strategy. p. 433-463. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2001.
JENSEN, M. C.; MECKLING, W. Theory of firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, v. 3, n. 4, p. 305-360, 1976.
JOHNSON, S.; LAPORTA, R.; SILANES, F.; SHLEIFER, A. Tunneling, American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, v. 90, n. 2, p. 22-27, 2000.
KHANNA, T.; PALEPU, K. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, v. 75, p. 3-10, 1997.
KHANNA, T.; PALEPU, K. The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, v. 43, p. 268-285, 2000.
KHANNA, T.; PALEPU, K. Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups The Journal of Finance, v. 55, n. 2, 2000b.
KHANNA, T.; RIVKIN, J. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, v. 22, p. 45-74, 2001.
KHANNA, T.; YAFEH, Y. Business groups in emerging markets: paragons or parasites? Journal of Economic Literature, v. 45, n. 2, p. 331-372, 2007.
KIM, H.; KIM, H.; HOSKISSON, R. E. Does market-oriented institutional change in an emerging economy make business-group-affiliated multinationals perform better? An institution-based view. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 41, p.1141-1160, 2010.
LAMIN, A. The Business Group as an information resource: an investigation of business group affiliation in the Indian software services industry. Academy of Management Journal, 2012.
LAPORTA, R.; LOPEZ-DE-SILANES, F.; SHLEIFER, A. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, v. 54, p. 471-517, 1999.
LAPORTA, R.; LOPEZ-DE-SILANES, F.; SHLEIFER, A.; VISHNY, R. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, v. 52, p. 1131-1150, 1997.
LAZZARINI, S. G. Mudar tudo para não mudar nada: análise da dinâmica de redes de proprietários no Brasil como “mundos pequenos”. RAE-eletrônica, v. 6, n. 1, p. 120-137, 2007.
LEE, K.; KANG, Y. Business groups in China. In: COLPAN, A. M.; HIKINO, T.; LINCOLN, J. R. (Org.). The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups. (pp. 210-236). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2010.
LEE, K.; PENG, M. W.; LEE, K. From diversification premium to diversification discount during institutional transitions. Journal of World Business, v. 43, p. 47-65, 2008.
LEFF, N. Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups. Economic Development and Cultural Change, v. 26, p. 661-675, 1978.
LUO, X.; CHUNG, C. N. Keeping it all in the family: the role of particularistic relationships in Business Group performance during institutional transition. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 50, p. 404-439, 2005.
MAHMOOD, I. P.; MITCHELL, W. Two faces: effects of business groups on innovation in emerging markets. Management Science, v. 50, n. 10, p. 1348-1365, 2004.
MAMAN, D. The emergence of business groups: Israel and South Korea compared. Organization Studies, v. 23, p. 737-58, 2002.
NEWMAN, K. L. Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval. Academy of Management Review, v. 25, n. 3, p. 602-619, 2000.
NORTH, D. C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
PENG, M. W. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, v. 28, n. 2, p. 275-296, 2003.
PENG, M. W.; LEE, S; WANG, D. Y. L. What determines the scope of the firm over time? a focus on institutional relatedness. Academy of Management Review, v. 30, n. 3, p. 622-633, 2005.
PENG, M. W.; WANG, D. Y. L; JIANG, Y. An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 39, p. 920-936, 2008.
PEROTTI, E. C.; GELFER, S. Red Barons or Robber barons? Governance and investment in Russian financial-industrial groups. European Economic Review, v. 9, p. 1601-1617, 2001.
RAMASWAMY, K.; LI, M.; VELIYATH, R. Variations in ownership behavior and propensity to diversify: a study of the Indian corporate context. Strategic Management Journal, v. 23, n. 4, p. 345-358, 2002.
SCHNEIDER, B. R. A comparative political economy of diversified business groups. Review of International Political Economy, v. 23, n. 26, p. 1-24, 2008.
SCHNEIDER, B. R. A comparative political economy of diversified business groups, or how states organize big business. Review of International Political Economy, v. 16, n. 2, p. 178-201, 2009.
SCHNEIDER, B. R. Politics in Latin America. 2010. In: COLPAN, A. M.; HIKINO, T.; LINCOLN, J. R. (Org.). The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups. p. 307-329. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2010.
SCHULER, D.; REHBEIN, K; CRAMER, R. Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: a multivariate approach. Academy of Management Journal, v. 45, n. 4, p 659-672, 2002.
SHLEIFER, A.; VISHNY, R. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, v. 52, n. 2, p. 737-783, 1997.
SHORT, H. Ownership, control, financial structure and the performance of firms. Journal of Economic Surveys, v. 8, n. 3, p. 203-249, 1994.
SINGH, D.; GAUR, A. Business group affiliation, firm governance, and firm performance: evidence from China and India. Corporate Governance, v. 17, n. 4, p. 411-425, 2009.
THOMSEN, S.; PEDERSEN, T. Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, v. 21, n. 6, p. 689-705, 2000.
THORNTON, P. H. The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, v. 45, n. 1, p. 81-101, 2002.
TORRES, J. P.; BERTÍN, M. J.; LÓPEZ-ITURRIAGA, F. J. Corporate control and firm value: The bright side of business groups. Journal of Family Business Strategy, v. 8, n. 2, p. 99-108, 2017.
VAALER, P. M. How do MNCs vote in developing country elections? Academy of Management Journal, v. 51, n. 1, p. 21-43, 2008.
WAN, W.; HOSKISSON, R. Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, v. 46, n. 1, p. 27-45, 2003.
WILLIAMSON, O. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock. Looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 38, n. 3, p. 595-613, 2000.
WILLIAMSON, O. A short history Washington consensus. In: From the Washington consensus towards a new global governance. p. 24-25. Barcelona: Fund. CIDOB, 2004.
YIU, D.; BRUTON, G.; LU, Y. Understanding business groups performance in an emerging economy: acquiring resources and capabilities in order to prosper. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 183-206, 2005.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Wlamir Xavier, Silvio Parodi Camilo, Rosilene Marcon, Frederick Greene
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Estou ciente de que, através da submissão voluntária de meu texto ao corpo editorial da revista Visão, editada pela Universidade Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe - UNIARP, estou concedendo à Universidade Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe a autorização de publicar o respectivo texto na revista a título não oneroso e declarando a originalidade do texto e sua não submissão simultanea a qualquer outro periódico, em meu nome e em nome dos demais coautores, se eventualmente existirem.Reitero que permaneço como legítimo titular de todos os direitos patrimoniais que me são inerentes na condição de autor. Comprometo-me também a não submeter este mesmo texto a qualquer outro periódico no prazo de, pelo menos, um (1) ano. Declaro estar ciente de que a não observância deste compromisso acarretará em infração e conseqüente punição tal como prevista na Lei de Proteção de Direitos Autorias (Nº9609, de 19/02/98).
Revista Visão: Gestão Organizacional está licenciado com uma Licença 